Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (7340)	8/1/2003 11:55:27 AM
From: Scott Bergquist	Respond to of 8683

"could be classified". Yes, could is the key word here. I think anyone that worked in the CIA in 1990, then held various positions of increasing responsibility in government intelligence would know all about the rules... far better than you or I. The clerics of the Dark Ages would debate then number of teeth in a horses mouth, consulting all sorts of ancient experts (Archimedes, Aristotle, etc). But no one would actually =look= in any horse's mouth! What!? What a concept! I suggest you actually examine Kenneth Pollack's book. This worry about "if he revealed CIA classified material" sounds like one of those "Yellowcake" missions. Why bother? Sandintoes, I owe you a "guilty" on the 'Treason' book. It -is- footnoted in the back. I missed it when examining the book the first time.