SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin Rose who wrote (437225)8/1/2003 2:46:43 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 769667
 
Even if WMD are NEVER found...the war was still justified on the basis of the intelligence we possessed and the potential threat to US national security....all Saddam had to do was comply with UNSCR 1441.....he did not....and the fact that we could not verify that Iraq had given up its quest to possess and maintain WMD is all the justification we needed under the Bush doctrine....I don't give a flying hoot what the rest of the world thinks....they were not attacked on 9/11.....



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (437225)8/1/2003 2:53:35 PM
From: Don Earl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
In early 2001, Dick Cheney commissioned a report from The Baker Institute for Public Policy, a think tank set up by
James Baker III, senior councilor of Carlyle Group, a private investment firm with huge interests in energy and defense
contracts.

It’s really no surprise weapons of mass destruction have not been found in Iraq, and that evidence presented to the
public by the Bush Administration has been proven false. The plan to gain control of Iraqi oil, using weapons of mass
destruction as an excuse, was not a CIA program, but a program thought up by oil company CEOs and investment
bankers long before 9/11.

Quoting directly from the published Baker Report, "Strategic Energy Policy Challenges for the 21st Century", the
report states:

<<<The United States should conduct an immediate policy review toward Iraq, including military, energy, economic,
and political/diplomatic assessments. The United States should then develop an integrated strategy with key allies in
Europe and Asia and with key countries in the Middle East to restate the goals with respect to Iraqi policy and to
restore a cohesive coalition of key allies. Goals should be designed in a realistic fashion, and they should be clearly and
consistently stated and defended to revive U.S. credibility on this issue. Actions and policies to promote these goals
should endeavor to enhance the well-being of the Iraqi people. Sanctions that are not effective should be phased out
and replaced with highly focused and enforced sanctions that target the regime's ability to maintain and acquire
weapons of mass destruction. A new plan of action should be developed to use diplomatic and other means to support
U.N. Security Council efforts to build a strong arms-control regime to stem the flow of arms and controlled substances
into Iraq. Policy should rebuild coalition cooperation on this issue, while emphasizing the common interest in security.
This issue of arms sales to Iraq should be brought near the top of the agenda for dialogue with China and Russia.

Once an arms-control program is in place, the United States could consider reducing restrictions on oil investments
inside Iraq.....

Virtually all actions available to remove obstacles along the supply chain in the very short term involve tradeoffs with
other policy objectives, including environmental, national security, and foreign policy concerns....Proper policy must
consider measures that will prevent the public from keeping U.S. energy security perpetually beyond reach.>>>

Among the contributors to this report are:

Steven Miller, Chairman and CEO of Shell Oil Company
Kenneth Lay, Chairman and CEO of Enron Corporation
John Manzoni, Regional President for British Petroleum
David O'Reilly, Chairman and CEO of Chevron Texaco
Kenneth Randolph, General Counsel and Secretary of Dynegy, Inc.

commondreams.org

rice.edu