SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (109440)8/2/2003 8:36:22 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
One explanation for not releasing the data... Contacts , names are mentioned that helped U.S. and are still active and could put them in a bad place. forget which head talker gave this explanation...



To: LindyBill who wrote (109440)8/2/2003 11:15:49 AM
From: JohnM  Respond to of 281500
 
You know the Dems will leak it for the election, if nothing else. Their record on leaking Intel is just short of treasonous.

Very bad comment, Bill. Shelby is as likely to leak it as anyone.



To: LindyBill who wrote (109440)8/2/2003 12:28:03 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I think if it was really explosive, it would have leaked already

It sounds to me like it is leaking. I think it suits Bush better not to be the responsible party in this case - it leaves him more options in dealing with Saudi Arabia.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News