Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (173133)	8/2/2003 2:37:53 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574129

Ted, Well if that's the way you feel, why did you ask JF if he had any praise for Bush's dealings with NK? JF once asked whether the ends justify the means WRT Iraq. I assumed you and JF agreed the ends were desirable, but the means were what you objected to. Now Bush is pursuing what you two would consider the proper means to an end. Yet now the two of you focus on the end without acknowledging that Bush is pursuing your preferred means. Like I said before, it's a little early to be doing that. Huh? You've lost me. Either the smog is getting to you, or our CA like weather is getting to me. BTW we have not had measurable rain since the first week in June. ted

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (173133)	8/2/2003 2:43:16 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574129

Ten, re: Hardly any acknowledgement of diplomacy, except grudgingly Well God Bless the wisdom of President Bush, he hasn't attacked North Korea... yet! I'm sorry I haven't given him enough credit for that, I was too preoccupied with his not attacking Iran, Sudan or Syria. Hell, I'm sure he could divert 1/2 of the occupying force in Iraq if he didn't feel his exceptional NK diplomacy was working. When did you say was the last time he talked to those NK guys? John