Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (20207)	8/4/2003 8:32:08 AM
From: LPS5	Respond to of 23908

Another disappointingly predictable attempt to divert attention from your continuing unwillingness (inability?) to back this assertion. To recap: Message 19164529 ***** One needs citations for the Gulf of Tonkin hoax? Certainly; an emotional word like "hoax" should be backed up, and in that article, it isn't. Of course, as always, you are welcome (however unlike it might be) to provide credible evidence to the effect that a "hoax" took place. You are wrong, as usual[.] I would be, but of course, that isn't what I said. What I posted was that on the Policy Analysis Market website... While terrorism and other such events might fall within the third category, I don't see anything specifically alluding to that. Check it yourself. Message 19157403 Any other questions? LPS5