SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (71363)8/3/2003 12:48:50 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Most people wouldn't accept my comment as true. If it is considered true then equal opportunity laws are on shaky ground.

True, but it is if the state is party to excluding you due to group identification.

Could you be more specific? What action are you talking about that makes the state a party to excluding who? If your talking about gay marriage laws I, perhaps mistakenly, thought you had accepted the distinction between active abuse and passively allowing a unequal condition to exist.

Tim



To: Lane3 who wrote (71363)8/3/2003 12:49:36 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Damn, how come you said it so well in one sentence while I labored over the distinction? :)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News