Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (71429)	8/4/2003 7:51:37 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Not at all. Look at how Roe v. Wade was passed under the radar. I disagree. While the legalization of something is important because it gives credence to its acceptability, the popularization is what makes the difference. If Roe were effected by only a few took advantage of it, it wouldn't have had much of an effect. The single biggest change that has occurred, the acceptability of living together and even having kids without benefit of marriage, did not result from any change in law. It became popular on its own. Any changes to the law resulted from the increased acceptance and popularity. If there is no groundswell for plural marriages, it won't matter much if they're legal or not.