Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Support the French! Viva Democracy! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (2340)	8/4/2003 9:03:43 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7834

Well, I guessed it would be too difficult, sad that you could not prove my statistics wrong. however, some of the top-leaders of USA often use the terms consensus and consensus-mechanism, but not when statistically the US masses would listen. Been the same since the early 1900s, so maybe there is hope. Maybe one can hope for the transatlantic love-duet to open those eyes and minds?? bassmann.momb.net atmo.se As the ancient vikings used to say ...LIP-SYNKED AND FORCED TO SAY THINGS THEY WOULD NEVER SAY, THINGS THAT EVERYBODY KNOWS ARE MORE TRUE THAN THE THINGS THEY USUALLY SAY. While the irish, scots and the welsh nodded and steered far away from any two-party system.

To: Solon who wrote (2340)	8/4/2003 9:16:13 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 7834

That ReCall stuff, how much could be recalled considering how outdated it is?? two times in US history should be no real recall obstacle, no?? Or is the answer in redistricting without a quorum, a couple of years late???? or just dangling chads?? or all the old two-party mechanisms?? ANyway, may that statue torch shine some light, finally, slowly but into the darkest nights, then as well as now and at least in the futures. Btw, why did the principle of proportional representation enter the USA in the 1960-70s?? (although according to the major principles of the know-nothing party)