Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (109926)	8/4/2003 3:41:12 PM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

More answers or Elusions I have posted several links, Jochen posted a link back on the 18th, did you not read any of those links ? I have posted the actual remarks on the thread, did you not read any of those remarks ? I will repost another comment that is found just a little ways back on the thread, perhaps you might comment on Mr. Hamre's claim, here it is... <<<<The United States needs to quickly mobilize a new reconstruction coalition that is significantly broader than the coalition that successfully waged the war. The scope of the challenges, the financial requirements, and rising anti-Americanism in parts of the country make necessary a new coalition that involves various international actors (including from countries and organizations that took no part in the original war coalition). The Council for International Cooperation at the CPA is a welcome innovation, but it must be dramatically expanded and supercharged if a new and inclusive coalition is to be built.>> Mr. Hamre feels that the new coalition must be inclusive, do you think Mr. Bush has taken the recommended step of supercharging the process of obtaining international co-operation ?