SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (253937)8/4/2003 8:22:30 PM
From: orkrious  Respond to of 436258
 
that's a surprise <g>



To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (253937)8/4/2003 10:50:46 PM
From: Gut Trader  Respond to of 436258
 
When you include those unemployed now showing up as Bisquits its probably north of 25%.

GT@SoylentGreen.com



To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (253937)8/5/2003 5:13:54 AM
From: Oblomov  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Is it reasonable to count them as unemployed? I thought the point of measuring unemployment was to understand the level of nonstructural unemployment. Why should we count those who don't bother to even look?



To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (253937)8/5/2003 10:23:30 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
Yah, well the Challenger Christmas report calls "bull$hit" on the BLS numbers...

10:00am 08/05/03 U.S. JULY JOB CUTS UP 43% TO 85,117: CHALLENGER