SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (4317)8/5/2003 11:30:30 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793731
 
This article is the first big surfacing of what is already happening, IMO

News Media May Follow Fox From Objectivity To Partiality

By KEVIN CANFIELD
Courant Staff Writer

August 5 2003

The nation's most powerful media organizations share one thing: They're all objective - or at least they say they are. Though everyone who gathers and reports news has his or her personal beliefs and biases, the biggest newspapers and the network news outfits all try to play to the middle. After all, that's where you'll find most readers and viewers.

But is this era of objectivity coming to an end? Some are certain that it is.

Writing in the September issue of The Atlantic Monthly, James Fallows argues that the mainstream media, prodded by decidedly partisan news organizations like Rupert Murdoch's Fox News and New York Post, will eventually exhibit clear political leanings and ideological positions.

"Sooner or later Murdoch's outlets, especially Fox News, will be more straightforward about their political identity - and they are likely to bring the rest of the press with them," writes Fallows, author of "Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy." "There will be liberal papers, radio shows, TV programs and websites for liberals, and conservative ones for conservatives."

Citing what he contends is the liberal bias of the leading news organizations in America and England, Wall Street Journal columnist Robert L. Bartley, editor emeritus of the Journal's highly conservative editorial page, suggested last week that "we're coming to the end of the era of `objectivity' that has dominated journalism" for several decades.

Though many on the right argue that ostensibly objective news organizations such as The New York Times and CBS News are actually quite biased, the goal of the mainstream media is, for the most part, to be objective. This, though, is a relatively new phenomenon, and one largely unique to the United States. American papers of the 19th and early 20th centuries were often extremely partisan, and many papers throughout the rest of the world tilt hard to the political left or right.

The thinking that informs Fallows' contention and Bartley's goes like this: Media objectivity has, in a relative sense, been a blip on the screen. The idea that newspapers and electronic media should remain impartial held sway for most of the 1900s, but it is one that will eventually yield to a different set of beliefs about the way news should be reported.

Some believe that era has arrived.

"Right now," says Kurt Andersen, former editor of New York magazine, "everybody seems to be buying into the idea that the marketplace of ideas means the marketplace of ideas, and it's not incumbent upon everybody to go right down the middle."

Keith Olbermann, host of "Countdown," MSNBC's prime-time news program, says bias in news coverage arises less from ideology than from market forces.

"The seeming fading of impartiality is a direct result of the deregulation of radio and television," Olbermann says. "Networks and stations that pander to a particular political audience aren't doing it for philosophical reasons; they simply perceive a valuable demographic group. I always think of the Monty Python sketch in which the same newscast is repeated five or six times for different animals. `And now the news for Wombats. No wombats were involved in a collision on the M-4 motorway ...' `And now the news for Parakeets. No parakeets were involved in a collision on the M-4 motorway.'"

William Powers, media columnist for National Journal magazine, says the era of news without overt bias is not necessarily coming to an end. But he believes news organizations should embrace the biases and opinions that they do hold.

"I think everybody would be better off if they were just a little bit more comfortable with the idea that we do all have these tendencies and that it's not necessarily a bad thing," Powers says.

Powers, for example, suggests that papers assign a liberal reporter to cover the right-wing Bush administration. "It would be better if we were all open about it. It would be a relief to everyone - both the journalists and the audience - because as readers we wind of having to be detectives, figuring out, `Well, what are they really getting at here?'"

Big papers and TV networks are unlikely to pronounce themselves liberal or conservative any time soon; even Murdoch's obviously conservative Fox News claims itself to be "fair and balanced." But perhaps news outfits are beginning to report with more of a point of view, and this may not be a bad thing.

"The question isn't: Are you personally more sympathetic to one side than the other. It's whether or not you can be skeptical about `your' side and fair about the `other,'" says Olbermann. "And to do that, the news media always has to point out not just the proverbial new clothes of the emperor but also those of the opposition."

ctnow.com



To: michael97123 who wrote (4317)8/5/2003 11:39:55 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793731
 
mike@brainstormingonaslowday.com


On slow days we can always discuss the "Media story about the Media" in the Kobe case. This is from a Philadelphia Tabloid.

lindybill@sixmonthsuntiltheprimaries.com

TRIAL OF THE NEW CENTURY
O.J. ONLY A DEMO OF WHAT TO EXPECT
By JIM NOLAN
nolanj@phillynews.com

THANKS TO Kobe Bryant, O.J. Simpson can now hunt for the "real killers" in peace.

Eight years after O.J., it's time for a new "Trial of the Century."

And the State of Colorado vs. Kobe Bryant has all the elements of the next great cable-news soap opera:

Celebrity, sex, violence and high stakes.

Fortunately, no one is dead.

But by the time the rape case against Bryant is put to bed, Kobe's career could be over, and Geraldo could have another talk show.

"The industry of TV news requires a trial of the century to hold them over between stories of the century," said Robert Thompson, Syracuse University professor of communications.

O.J., he said, was a "dress rehearsal" for the kind of coverage people can expect in the days ahead. "The 24-hour news channels have now figured out how they're going to grip a nation."

Bryant, 24, is scheduled to appear tomorrow in Eagle, Colo., to be arraigned formally on a single felony sexual-assault charge, stemming from a June 30 hotel-room rendezvous with a 19-year-old employee.

The alleged victim, a former high school cheerleader, says Bryant raped her and refused to let her leave after she willingly accompanied him to his room at the Lodge and Spa at Cordillera in Edwards, Colo., where she was working.

Bryant, who is married with an infant daughter, admits he had sex with the woman, but says it was consensual.

The sexual-assault charge carries a prison term of four years to life upon conviction, plus a hefty fine.

A trial is likely months away. But that hasn't kept the court of public opinion from sopping up saturation coverage a la O.J.

Granted, there is no white Bronco chase or freeloading houseguest. But there are a number of similarities between the two criminal cases that make it hard not to watch.

When good celebrities go bad

Prior to their arrest, both Simpson and Bryant had largely unblemished reputations in the public eye.

The "Juice" went from being one of the NFL's all-time-greatest running backs to a successful broadcasting career and lovable celebrity pitchman.

He ran through airports for Hertz and played the slapstick sidekick Nordberg opposite Leslie Nielsen in the "Naked Gun" movies.

Kobe was a renaissance man at 18 - well-traveled and fluent in Italian, the son of a former NBA player.

His wholesome image, charisma and unlimited ability on the court made him the rightful heir to Michael Jordan's NBA legacy, with his own compliment of multimillion-dollar soft-drink and sneaker deals.

"He's arguably an even more famous person than O.J. because he is in the prime of his career," said Loyola Law School professor Stan Goldman, who teaches criminal law and worked as a legal analyst for Fox during the Simpson trial.

"You've got a character you already know - his celebrity equity is there, and suddenly he's in this completely different story," Syracuse's Thompson said.

"And it's all going to play out in the ultimate TV drama, the courtroom."

Sex

Simpson's sexual jealousies of his former wife, Nicole Brown, were well-documented during his criminal trial and subsequent wrongful-death civil trial.

The heart of the charges against Bryant entail sex - at the very least, adultery, and at the worst, rape.

"It's salacious," Loyola's Goldman said. "Crimes of passion, of love - all that plays into the publicity."

He said that while the charges against Bryant may not be as serious as murder, the debate over whether their encounter was consensual or not is likely to have more resonance in living rooms of the general public.

"What also makes it interesting is that while it became so obvious that Simpson was guilty...in this case there might be some issue as to culpability - not just did he do it, but did he know he shouldn't be doing it? Did she communicate, and how did she communicate?"

Goodbye, Nutella

Simpson was on trial for his freedom. He won that, but lost his former life.

Bryant, likewise, faces a potential life prison term if convicted. But arguably his greatest challenge could be holding on to the life he's made - a new marriage and family, a career still in its prime, and millions in endorsements.

Yesterday, published reports said the makers of Nutella, the sweet chocolate spread, became the first product to dump Bryant as spokesman.

To keep Kobe in Nike, Coke and McDonald's, being found "not guilty" might not be enough, especially in the aftermath of O.J.

"He has to come out of this without the mystery of did or didn't he do it," Goldman said. "They have to prove he didn't do it."

Stay tuned.

philly.com



To: michael97123 who wrote (4317)8/5/2003 12:08:44 PM
From: Rascal  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 793731
 
Gore received 500,000 more votes than Bush!
If Nader were not in he would have received all of those votes too!
And it was at a time when the public was fed the Rock and Roll that Bush was a compassionate conservative, believed in humble foreign policy and did not believe in Nation Building. He touted tax cuts to "Give Americans Back their Money" and was supported by Greenspan who said there was a risk of the Surplus being too high.

Check back 12 months from now to see how the Rock and Roll plays out. The fact pattern will be very different.

Rascal @TheSupremesDidItNotTheVoters.com