Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (71720)	8/5/2003 4:17:38 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Its only ridiculous or extreme as a description of how things are or might be, in the context of Neo's point it is not. Tim

To: epicure who wrote (71720)	8/5/2003 4:56:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

It is not a reference to the future, it is a reference to the past. It simply makes the point that if it were possible for our remote ancestors to all be gay, we very likely would have died out as a species. If we somehow survived, supposing that some could become aroused and manage heterosexual sex, it still would have been in dwindling numbers, with eventual likely extinction. It is to emphasize that which one is the norm is not a matter of indifference, but directly affected our future as a species.