To: Don Earl who wrote (1762 ) 8/5/2003 11:58:55 PM From: Raymond Duray Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039 Don, That was a rather remarkable set of URLs. The GOP-USA gal was a staffer for Pat Robertson? Oh, my. That makes her a completely credible source, now doesn't it? To understand my disdain for Pat Robertson and anyone who would associate herself with Robertson or the GOP propaganda machine, I'd suggest you take a brief hiatus from 9/11 and visit darkest Africa: gregpalast.com An alternative headline might have been "Diamonds Are a Preacher's Best Friend". <g> ***** The other article from Insight.com was interesting in one sense. It illuminated the fact that Hatfill was associated with the U.S. and Rhodesian Army Rangers from 78-84, a fact that the GOPUSA biographer conveniently glossed over. But the glowing praise for Hatfill, the noble soldier (aka: government paid murderer) is contrasted in the Insight article to the wickedly grasping public school teacher. Oh my. You do see how one is so noble and the other so lame? Yes? I hope so, because it is totally unintelligible gibberish to me. ************ To summarize, you are certainly welcome to your own opinion on Rosenberg, but I'm concerned about what you are presenting as your "facts". :) [[BTW, I've never seen Rosenberg accuse Hatfill of being the perp. Nor have you. All we've seen is the spinmeisters of the Right accuse Rosenberg of accusing Hatfill. That's part of the through-the-looking-glass aspect of this bizarrely twisted plot.]] On a credibility scale of 1-10, I wouldn't rate Insight or GOPUSA above a 2.5. I rate Rosenberg's FAS material, and the BBB a solid 8.0+. We'll simply have to agree to disagree. Cheerio!