Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (71806)	8/6/2003 11:40:21 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

ROFL only if we "contemplate" it the way you see it you aren't thinking about how they got to be this way- they had to come from somewhere, so clearly they reproduced- up until the generation you are "contemplating". Your hypothetical is absurd. No species would simply stop propagating, because of the urge in those that carry young to carry them. Even homosexual animals would mate to become parents if it were absolutely necessary- that is simply the way species are. What you imagine, is a species that suddenly refuses to propagate. Well we CAN imagine that, but it is absurd, and it doesn't prove anything, except that you can imagine this very bizarre situation that has no precedent and that we have no evidence for. We know that very homosexual people have married and fathered or mothered children. We have evidence of that. We have no evidence that a situation like the one you "imagine" could ever or has ever existed. It proves nothing. I know you think it does, but it only confirms your own prejudices, nothing more.