SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sig who wrote (110313)8/7/2003 12:24:06 AM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 281500
 
s that the one Eastwood stole? Could be. <g>

I agree about the rest.



To: Sig who wrote (110313)8/7/2003 1:00:25 AM
From: Dayuhan  Respond to of 281500
 

Facts and evidence in UN reports , Intelligence reports, and past actions of Saddam which are all overwhelmingly in favor of a conclusion that Saddam did have WMD's and WMD programs of some form.

We are still waiting, though, for facts and evidence to suggest that the overall threat Saddam posed was anything even remotely close to what it was claimed to be before the war.

Back then it was "If we don't move now Saddam will take over the Gulf". Now it's "we're sure he had some weapons programs".

Bit of difference there.



To: Sig who wrote (110313)8/7/2003 8:55:21 AM
From: Noel de Leon  Respond to of 281500
 
"Looking at the scene, a person could stand on a foot of dirt on top of a buried plastic barrel of chemicals and not be able to detect it with a metal detector."

A MIG 25 buried under a plastic barrel? "It" in your sentence refers to something metal. How big is your barrel of chemicals? How do you think the MIG was detected?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News