Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (11492)	8/7/2003 5:18:35 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

Who mentioned Kobe? Did I mention an out-of-control sports fiend, buddy? :-) In the case being referred to, there is no doubt of the reliability of the evidence. There were legal records to prove it and the city would have testified to it. And it wasn't going to mislead the jury; it was simply going to provide them with the whole truth. Isn't that part of that oath- -"the whole truth"? So why exclude it? Jury nullification is legal, correct? A jury deciding that a law passed by a legislative body should not be applied in a particular circumatance because of unforeseen exculpatory or mitigating circumstances?