Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elpolvo who wrote (24675)	8/8/2003 1:16:04 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 89467

Military Warns Soldiers Against Public Criticism by Bradley Graham Published on Friday, August 8, 2003 by the Washington Post Several U.S. Army soldiers in Iraq who expressed anger last month toward Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld after their tours of duty were extended have not been punished but have received warnings about respecting the chain of command, according to a senior Army officer. In a July 16 appearance on ABC's "Good Morning America," the unnamed soldiers, all members of the 3rd Infantry Division, echoed frustration widely felt at delays in plans to bring them home. "If Donald Rumsfeld was here, I'd ask him for his resignation," one said. The remarks drew a rebuke from Army Gen. John P. Abizaid, the top U.S. commander in the region. He warned that troops were not "free to say anything disparaging about" the defense secretary or the president, and said disciplinary action would be up to "the commanders on the scene." "Those soldiers were not formally disciplined per se," said a senior Army officer in Washington who declined to be named. Instead, the soldiers received "a good talk" from senior noncommissioned officers who "reinforced their obligations as soldiers to respect their military and civilian chain of command," the officer added. Top defense officials showed little sign this week of having pursued the case. "I haven't even asked," Gen. John Keane, the Army's vice chief of staff, told reporters who questioned him Tuesday. But Keane also reiterated the warning to troops to watch what they say about leaders. "I don't believe that anyone who's wearing a uniform in this country in a public forum should be critical of the chain of command. Period," the general said. "The chain of command is fundamental to the operating of our military organizations. There are places to disagree with the chain of command, and it's appropriate for military leaders to do so. And that should be done in a private fashion, not in a public fashion." © 2003 The Washington Post Company commondreams.org

To: elpolvo who wrote (24675)	8/8/2003 1:25:54 PM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 89467

i read it much better than he did. the guy puts me to sleep. <g> I saw him on C-SPAN, and thought it was one of his best performances. Surely a few of his gestures were woodenly scripted, but better. The question still "rattling around" in my largely empty cranium is why? Is it just a "You blew it" speech to the American public that didn't give him a sufficient plurality to get him to the WH? Is he considering a draft? Is he positioning himself for a cabinet position? Maybe he's already thinking of '08? JMO lurqer