SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: quehubo who wrote (110844)8/10/2003 12:05:43 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Bush and Nuclear Arms
__________________________________

To the Editor of The New York Times:

Re "Facing a Second Nuclear Age" (Week in Review, Aug. 3):

By invading Iraq, which they knew did not have nuclear weapons, and treating North Korea with kid gloves because they knew it did, and now by planning to develop a new class of battlefield nuclear weapons, President Bush and his advisers send a dangerous message to "rogue states" and terrorists everywhere — that the road to world power lies in possessing these weapons.

A generation of physicians has warned that nuclear weapons result in such enormous and long-lasting devastation for human populations that they cannot be used in warfare. By ignoring their warnings, much as it continues to ignore the warnings of the international scientific community about global warming, the Bush administration is leading us all down paths of greater and greater peril.

ERIC CHIVIAN, M.D.
Boston, Aug. 6, 2003
The writer is a co-founder of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, which won the 1985 Nobel Peace Prize.

nytimes.com



To: quehubo who wrote (110844)8/10/2003 12:32:18 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Ah, so what you're saying is that we are all obligated to give our full backing to every stupid war any president comes up with. For the sake of the troops. Cool, but logically dubious.