Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (25050)	8/11/2003 8:28:53 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 89467

The Art of the False Impression ______________________ By BOB HERBERT OP-ED COLUMNIST THE NEW YORK TIMES August 11, 2003 Al Gore slipped into Manhattan last week and gave a rousing speech downtown before a very young audience at New York University. He got some coverage, but Mr. Gore has never been mistaken for an entertainer. In the superamplified media din created by the likes of Arnold and Kobe and Ben and Jen, it's very difficult for the former vice president, a certified square, to break into the national conversation. That says a lot about us and the direction we're headed in as a nation. You can agree with Mr. Gore's politics or not, but some of the points he's raising, especially with regard to President Bush's credibility on such crucial issues as war and terror and the troubled economy, deserve much closer attention. "Millions of Americans now share a feeling that something pretty basic has gone wrong in our country, and that some important American values are being placed at risk," said Mr. Gore. Keeping his language polite, the former vice president asserted that the Bush administration had allowed "false impressions" to somehow make their way into the public's mind. Enormous numbers of Americans thus came to believe that Saddam Hussein was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks and was actively supporting Al Qaeda; that Saddam's weapons of mass destruction were an imminent threat, and Iraq was on the verge of building nuclear weapons; that U.S. troops would be welcomed with open arms, and there was little danger of continued casualties in a prolonged guerrilla war. The essence of Mr. Gore's speech was that these corrosive false impressions were part of a strategic pattern of distortion that the Bush administration used to create support not just for the war, but for an entire ideologically driven agenda that overwhelmingly favors the president's wealthy supporters and is driving the federal government toward a long-term fiscal catastrophe. What if Mr. Gore is right? There's something at least a little crazy about an environment in which people are literally stumbling over one another to hear what Arnold Schwarzenegger has to say about the budget crisis in California (short answer: nothing), while ignoring what a thoughtful former vice president has to say about the budget and the economy of the U.S. Voters with children and grandchildren who may someday have to shoulder the backbreaking debt that is being piled up by the Bush crowd might want to carefully examine some of the points Mr. Gore is raising. The Bush administration would have you believe he is talking nonsense. But what if he's not? "Instead of creating jobs, for example, we are losing millions of jobs — net losses for three years in a row," said Mr. Gore. "That hasn't happened since the Great Depression." He then looked at the audience and deadpanned, to tremendous laughter: "As I've noted before, I was the first one laid off." Credibility is the Bush administration's Achilles' heel. If the public comes to believe that it cannot trust the administration about its reasons for going to war, about the real costs of the war in human lives and American dollars, about the actual state of the nation's defenses against terror and about the real beneficiaries of its economic policies, the Bush II presidency will be crippled, if not doomed. This is an administration that is particularly sensitive to light. It prefers to do business behind closed doors, with the curtains and shades drawn. Enormous taxpayer-financed contracts are handed out to a favored few without competitive bidding. We still don't know what went on at the secret meetings between Dick Cheney and top energy industry executives at the very beginning of the Bush reign. "It seems obvious," said Mr. Gore, "that big and important issues like the Bush economic policy and the first pre-emptive war in U.S. history should have been covered more extensively in the news media, and better presented to the American people, before our nation made such fateful choices. But that didn't happen, and in both cases reality is turning out to be very different from the impression that was given when the votes — and the die — were cast." The Bush administration has managed to dodge the hard questions and benefit from an atmosphere in which the media and much of the public would rather contemplate Jennifer's navel and Arnold's fading pecs than pursue a possible pattern of deceit at the highest levels of government. nytimes.com

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (25050)	8/11/2003 8:51:03 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 89467

At Least Gore is Still Debating Bush _______________________ by Tom Brazaitis Published on Sunday, August 10, 2003 by the Cleveland Plain Dealer Who better to analyze the decline and fall of the American economy than the man who lays claim to the dubious distinction of "the first one laid off" by George W. Bush? I'm talking, of course, about Al Gore, the former vice president whose claim on the presidency was rejected in 2000 not by a majority of the country's voters, but by a partisan Supreme Court. In a speech last week at New York University, Gore laid out a convincing case for how Americans have been duped by the Bush administration into an unnecessary war in Iraq and an economic catastrophe at home. This disastrous doubleheader came about without sufficient public debate, Gore said, because in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, a frightened public and a cowed Congress were only too willing to accept Bush's claims at face value. Until recently, the news media have been willing accomplices by failing to ask the tough questions, perhaps out of fear of sounding unpatriotic. The war in Iraq - a pre-emptive strike based on the false impression that Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 9/11 attacks and was planning to give al-Qaida terrorists poison gas, deadly germs and nuclear bombs - is costing the United States $1 billion a week and has put American troops "in an ugly and dangerous situation," Gore said. Domestically, the country was lured into believing that big tax cuts would unleash new investment that would create jobs, erase budget deficits with a spurt in economic growth and ease the tax burden on middle-class families, Gore said. Wrong. Millions of jobs have disappeared; projected deficits will set records for government red ink, and the wealthiest Americans - those least likely to spend money in ways that create jobs - are the biggest beneficiaries of the tax cuts. Gore quoted the 2001 winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics, George Akerlof, describing Bush's economic policies as "a form of looting." "Average personal debt is at an all-time record high," Gore said. "A lot of Americans are living on the economic edge." Laying the blame on the president, Gore said, "We ought to fire him and get a new one." Similarly, in announcing his retirement after a half-century in politics, including 38 years in the Senate, Sen. Ernest Hollings, the South Carolina Democrat, described Bush as "the weakest president" he has seen. Hollings bemoaned the prospects of the United States, a country that he said "doesn't make anything anymore." "At the end of World War II we had 40 percent of our work force in manufacturing," he said. "And now we're down to 10 percent. We've got 10 percent of the country working and producing, and we've got the other 90 percent talking and eating. "And we're eliminating jobs - hard manufacture, service, high-tech - all except the press and the politicians." It is tempting to dismiss the warnings by Gore and Hollings as the usual partisan carping, and many in the Bush camp will yield to that temptation. But if the cost in lives and dollars keeps rising in Iraq and the economy continues sputtering at home, more Americans will be drawn into the debate we should have had before we got into this mess. _________________________________ Brazaitis, formerly a Cleveland Plain Dealer senior editor, is a Washington columnist. © 2003 The Plain Dealer. commondreams.org