Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rascal who wrote (110959)	8/11/2003 11:16:23 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Will weapons inspector David Kay have answers to the important questions...? Message 19198082

To: Rascal who wrote (110959)	8/11/2003 3:44:49 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 281500

Message 19199153

To: Rascal who wrote (110959)	8/11/2003 7:09:09 PM
From: quehubo	Respond to of 281500

Rascal: I could not open the link you posted. You can be certain though that our President is looking after the best interests of the American taxpayer and the Iraqi's who wont have a stable enough legal system to attract investment for years. I am not a lawyer, but I have negotiated multimillion dollar contracts for long term business in foreign countries. So I am aware that investors will need substantial incentives to get the economy rolling in Iraq and off of the American taxpayers back. Everyday private capital is not entering Iraq is another day on our backs. So I would not touch CVX XOM or BP, but I own / trade companies such as WFT BJS NBR HAL are service companies that can sell services to Iraq and not have to make major investments in the country.