SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (72205)8/11/2003 11:01:05 AM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 82486
 
This could be major.

Huge consumer database cracked

By Online Staff
August 11, 2003

Print this article
Email to a friend

An attacker gained access to one of the world's largest consumer databases last week and was able to download information about some customers of the company's clients, according to a report at SecurityNewsPortal.

The report said access was gained to private files at Acxiom Corp, a company based in Little Rock, Arkansas, that counts among its clients Microsoft Corp, IBM, Sears Roebuck, AT&T, General Electric and Bank of America.

Acxiom's website says it services 14 of the top 15 credit card issuers, seven of the top 10 automotive manufacturers and seven of the top 10 media entertainment companies, among others.

The company's chief private officer, Jennifer Barrett, admitted the company was unaware of the breach until it was contacted by a law enforcement agency from Ohio.

Acxiom has not specified which data was accessed unlawfully.

smh.com.au



To: The Philosopher who wrote (72205)8/11/2003 11:30:03 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
You and I just differ, then, in whether we can recover.

I take your point about the cyclical nature of things and the rise in Christian fundamentalism. The traditionalist values movement is getting some play and respectability in the mainstream media. I am in favor of any enlightenment that keeps pubescent kids out of the sack.

But I don't see that reducing the distance between the horse and the barn by much, though. further, it seems to me, that if the horse is still on the county road, it doesn't matter all that much just where on that road he is. Maybe the divorce rate drops by ten percent. Maybe some more kids are raised by married parents. All that's a good thing, but not paradigm shifting.

The people of this country don't have either the will or the tools to restore the horse. What are you going to do about kids born out of wedlock? Deny them entry to school. Put a scarlet letter on them? Force their moms to have abortions before they are born? Are we going to decline the sale of a white wedding dress based on medical exam? Are we going to deny social security benefits to widows living in sin? We're not going to do any of that. I suppose it's possible that we might make divorce more difficult, but that doesn't obviate divorce, it merely enriches those who work through the loopholes and effect the divorce. Even if we reduced divorce, we're not going to require couples registering at motels to produce marriage licenses, marriage to each other, that is. That's a joke. If you can't divorce, you simply cheat and we can't stop that.

There are also influences in the opposite direction. As people live longer and grow more, the likelihood of people being soulmates for seventy years, and the attraction to young people of the prospect of seventy years, is reduced.

If you think we can get the horse back in the barn, tell me how. If you can't do better than the general cyclical nature of things, then I'm not willing to invest in it. I'd rather invest in something that is based on reality and feasibility.

As regards Good Things, it may be a good thing for kids to be raised by married parents of the opposite sex, but it is not a good thing to raise them in a world that fosters prejudice against those who are different or that shoehorns kids into a mold. I'm not willing to risk the latter to get a ten percent improvement in the former. For the whole loaf, maybe, but not for a half-baked cyclical shift.