SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lurqer who wrote (25108)8/11/2003 11:42:38 AM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
A graphic depiction

investorshub.com

lurqer



To: lurqer who wrote (25108)8/11/2003 11:47:32 AM
From: abuelita  Respond to of 89467
 
no. because it is
"Special to The Globe and Mail" :)

i consider it to be very ominous. the
bullseye just got a little bigger.

"We don't have the ability, like a state,
to import weapons, but everyone has his own
gun at home anyway," Mr. al-Khazraji said.
"We also have our faith in God, which is much
more powerful than any American weapon."

But Mr. al-Zurgani of the Shia religious
council warned that the volunteers are willing
and able.

"If the Americans have foul intentions, then
they have reason to fear us," he said. "We
will all become martyrs for the sake of Iraq."


-rose



To: lurqer who wrote (25108)8/11/2003 12:00:19 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
In the long run, the administration's fudging of the WMD intelligence is a mere nitpick compared to their stubborn refusal to work on a timetable that might have gotten our allies on board with our war plans, their criminally negligent lack of postwar planning, and their blinkered acceptance of the delusional neocon view that the United States can unilaterally change the culture of the Middle East via military power.

It's remarkable. I assume that George Bush and his advisors truly want to make America safer and the Middle East less dangerous, but at every step of the way they have followed plans that ensure almost exactly the opposite. It's the flip side of their domestic policy, where they have singlemindedly pursued strategies almost perfectly designed not to help solve the real problems the economy faces.

I'm not sure there's been a president in my lifetime who so obviously doesn't care about the actual facts of a situation before he formulates policies. I wonder if he even knows?

calpundit.com