Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: At_The_Ask who wrote (255115)	8/11/2003 8:24:13 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<<Euthanisation of dumb people would help but nobody supports that either....g>> Wrongo...just why do you think the tobacco companies exist?<1/2G>

To: At_The_Ask who wrote (255115)	8/11/2003 8:25:42 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

I support that idea Euthanisation of dumb people would help but nobody supports that either but then there would be nearly no one left to work?

To: At_The_Ask who wrote (255115)	8/12/2003 11:01:56 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

The hydrate reserves are huge and renewable there are various ways of extracting / harvesting the methane from the sea floor, but more R&D is needed. The rewards are huge and it should not be technically as difficult as one may think. After all they tried much more riskier projects to generate energy than that. Hot fusion for example ..... bringing the sun on earth Nuclear reactors, for example are very complicated but France is able to produce most of it's energy needs safely from nuclear reactors. There is no reason why the US could not start building again, new nuclear reactors and operate them like France ..... IMHO I, speculate that the oil and coal lobby are opposing also this venue with the help of those you mentioned in the last line of your post.