Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lurqer who wrote (25325)	8/13/2003 3:01:22 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Only Ansar al Islam? The terror schools at Sammarrah and Salman Pak? The Mujahedin-e-Khaiq (MEK)? The Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK)? The Palestine Liberation Front (PLF)? The Abu Nidal organization (ANO)? Al Qaeda? Fiancial assistance to Palestinian terrorists? Abu Mussab Al Zarqawi? Abu Nidal? Abu Abbas?

To: lurqer who wrote (25325)	8/13/2003 10:48:42 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 89467

Saddam and the Bomb: More Evidence He Wasn't Trying for One Message 19202775 <<...On every piece of evidence in the U.S. indictment of Iraq, the story is the same: With a weak case on the most powerful argument for war -- preventing Saddam Hussein from going nuclear -- the Bush administration exaggerated and twisted information, and frequently just made stuff up. In the antiwar camp, one of the most popular sayings is, "Bush lied, soldiers died." That's strong stuff, but there's more than a suggestion that it's true. When the Senate Intelligence Committee returns from its August recess and delves into these questions, it should strive hard to expose and make public the complete truth. The president's party controls the Senate and will likely try to limit the investigation. But senators have a higher calling than to party; it's to the American people whose sons and daughters are paying the price for the invasion of Iraq...>>