Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (173633)	8/13/2003 1:19:06 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573242

Al, Would tax hikes be considered a "hard choice" that also flies in the face of your accusation that he was fearful of polls? Hence the hiking of taxes on the "rich." The best way to increase taxes with a minimal effect on the polls. Tenchusatsu

To: Alighieri who wrote (173633)	8/13/2003 1:22:53 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573242

Would tax hikes be considered a "hard choice" that also flies in the face of your accusation that he was fearful of polls? Okay, genius. Why don't you tell me how many dollars Clinton "raised" through tax hikes during his administration, AND show me how that number of dollars accounts for the deficit reduction during that time period? Something like this: Year $ Tax Hikes Prev Projected Deficit Actual Reduction ==== =========== ====================== ====== ========= I want to know how many dollars were raised through tax hikes vs. the number of dollars the deficit was reduced. Perhaps you know?