Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (442315)	8/13/2003 1:02:40 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 769667

"Yes?" True, very true. However, the truth does not seem to be a useful resource in discussing this topic with the orc. I commend your attempts to engage him in a factual and rational discussion, anyway.

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (442315)	8/13/2003 2:32:53 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

So if the intelligence was faulty, how were they lying? If you make a mistake based on bad information, you made a mistake based on bad information, not because you were lying. When you pick and choose which intelligence to highlight and which to ignore, so that it supports your agenda, that's lying. The US was well aware than no uranium passed to Saddam from Niger. That info was already eliminated from a presidential speech in October of 2002. Several intelligence people have come forward raising the concern that Intelligence was tailored to fit the Bush Agenda. That's lying. And the proof is in the huge lack of evidence to back up the administration claims. They knew they were not telling the whole story. The biggest red flag that they were twisting intelligence comes from the lies about Al Qaeda and Saddam being in cahoots. These are the facts, and the Bush administration cannot hide from them. Orca