Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (111260)	8/13/2003 2:27:15 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The Chinese historical connection with Tibet seems to have made a deep impression on you. Here's a more recent description of the Chinese invasion of 1950 (not 1959 as I mistakenly said): October 7th, 1950 There is some uncertainty over the precise date, but it was apparently on October 7th that units of the Chinese so-called People's Liberation Army crossed the River Yangtze into Kham, the eastern province of Tibet in the foothills of the Himalayas. Varying estimates put their numbers at 40,000 or more than 80,000, but either way they were in overwhelming strength. The invasion had been planned in detail by Deng Xiaoping, a future Chinese premier, and two other senior Communist officials in China's Southwest Military Region. The rest of the world was preoccupied with events in Korea at the time, but the Chinese Communist regime had been announcing its intention of integrating Tibet with 'the motherland' for months. The Tibetan government in Lhasa, which had appealed for help in vain to both Britain and the United States, declined to receive Chinese emissaries, though a Tibetan delegation in India held inconclusive talks with the Chinese ambassador there. Back in January, Beijing had released a telegram from the Panchen Lama to Chairman Mao. 'On behalf of the Tibetan people, we respectfully plead for troops to be sent to liberate Tibet, to wipe out reactionaries, expel the imperialists …and liberate the Tibetan people.' The Panchen Lama was traditionally one of the most important religious figures in Tibet. This one was twelve years old and living in China. The Tibetan Army was hopelessly outnumbered and outclassed. With fewer than 10,000 men, it had only some fifty artillery pieces, 250 mortars and a couple of hundred machine guns. Its commanders were government officials with no special training. The soldiers took their women and children on campaign with them, with all their family belongings loaded on yaks and mules - tents, carpets, cooking pots and clothes, and babies in bundles on their mothers' backs. The Chinese, who were reported as feeling 'like a tiger trying to catch a fly', planned to surround them swiftly and prevent them from falling back to Lhasa. This was achieved over the next ten days or so, despite sporadic brave resistance by Tibetan horsemen wielding swords. The Tibetan provincial governor, Ngabo Ngawang Jigme, radioed Lhasa urgently for instructions. No answer came, and when another message was sent, on October 15th, the word was that the ministers and officials were all out on their annual picnic. On October 19th Ngabo told the Chinese he would surrender. The Chinese filmed him signing the formal document in the local monastery. All available Tibetan prisoners were assembled and subjected to a lecture on socialism and the unity of the motherland, after which they were given food and money, and told to go home and stay there. Having made their point, the Chinese now paused and demanded negotiations with Lhasa, and what they called 'peaceful liberation'. The Tibetans appealed to the United Nations, without effect. In due course Ngabo led a delegation to Beijing and an agreement was concluded in May 1951, which the Tibetans later maintained was signed under duress. In October that year the Chinese army entered Lhasa, and Beijing announced that the Tibetan people had 'returned to the big family of the People's Republic of China'. historybookshop.com

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (111260)	8/13/2003 5:59:01 PM
From: ThirdEye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

And all these "facts" definitely explain and justify the brutality with which the People's Army "integrated" Tibet, and with which they continue to "respect" the culture, don't they? I mean, if you wanted to destroy a culture that was totally integrated with its religious practice, destroy the religious institutions, bend them to your will and flood the country with "relocated" Chinese. Yeah, that's the benevolent way to fight imperialism, isn't it?