Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Wolf speed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yogizuna who wrote (7180)	8/14/2003 3:00:32 PM
From: Ron	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10714

If you go to the url on that story there is also a photo of Eric. I saw him once years ago and, man he looks very different now. And yes, I agree his frequent comments to the press before the proceedings are to me, an indicator that he is an out of control desperate person. For the reporter to even find him in his hotel room in Chapel Hill, is an indicator they were actively seeking out media attention. I doubt the reporter tracked him down through osmosis.. :) I would think the court proceeding would be about over for the day now.. be interesting to see the post hearing information...

To: Yogizuna who wrote (7180)	8/14/2003 9:27:17 PM
From: Selectric II	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10714

This is absolutely way too bizarre. There's no way that Eric Hunter, with all his body guards and hiding out, would have let any family member close enough to him to beat him up. And, no family member would have been so stupid as to do it to him just before the hearing. Afterwards, maybe, but not beforehand.<g> <edit> I just noticed: "Who is crazy here?" Eric Hunter asked in a bedside interview from a Chapel Hill hotel room where he was recovering from his injuries. Aw, come on, can anybody believe this crap? It's like something scripted from "Peyton Place" or "Dallas". Who wrote Eric's lines, and who's doing the makeup? He can't even get the chronology right. He said in the interview that the harassment reached a peak in May, yet today he's conveniently bruised and battered. I think he and his lawyer are confusing commercial/ corporate/ securities litigation with a domestic relations dispute, and gearing their proof toward the latter. Somehow I don't think the SEC or a federal judge will connect Eric's bruises or being called a nut by his mother as proof of securities violations.