Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (173859)	8/15/2003 12:27:59 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574046

How much of the $4 billion per month do you think is spent on reducing proverty in Iraq and how much do you think is spent maintaining a 150k army which is doing a poor job of maintaining the peace? Bringing order and some degree of freedom to Iraq is needed if it is going to develop. If we had not taken out Saddam then there would not be the freedom, if we left now there would be no order, so in a sense all of the $bil a month is spent on reducing poverty in Iraq. In the winter, the sky in Seattle is mostly gray so one could conclude that the sky is really gray and not blue. In the same way, one could conclude that spending money on the military intervention of Iraq is reducing poverty. However, the reality is that the sky isn't made gray by clouds and poverty is not reduced through military occupation. Both are optical illusions. ted