SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sandeep who wrote (7432)8/15/2003 1:33:00 PM
From: Scott Bergquist  Respond to of 8683
 
No, there is no timeframe by which I would accept that.

That is precisely what the "Committee for Concealment" is hoping for. As time goes by, people start acting like you do:

(1) Act as if 1991, instead of 1995, or 1998, was the last time the VX nerve gas, etc., were found.

(2) If no weapons found, no weapons existed. This is a simple and false application of logic, such as "No elephants in my neighborhood, so I must possess elephant repellant, somewhere."

When the US and Russia set out to mutually destroy nuclear warheads, there were plenty of representatives from both sides. Yet the Iraqis have produced no dates, no people who were present, and did not invite the UN inspectors. Why?

Why don't you mention the incident with Hussein Kamel in 1995?
On August 4, 1998, the Iraqi Assembly voted to end cooperation. Why? VX nerve gas found on missile warheads.

If the weapons are buried in the Bekaa Valley, as I suspect, it will be a long time before they are uncovered. This is the principle defense by the Saddam regime. Those who really know are dead: Qusayy, and the lesser souls who did the actual digging. The others don't know, for their own protection from torture.



To: sandeep who wrote (7432)8/15/2003 3:37:04 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8683
 
sand, the Neocons will never accept the fact that their Cinc lied to them. Even if he admits it, which is not likely.