SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin Rose who wrote (443548)8/15/2003 2:37:32 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Nope. Not equivalent offenses. My point is that being found guilty...or not guilty is not always determinative....

Reagan was a giant...a much better President than Clinton....hands down...no question.....

GWB has also been an inspirational leader under tough circumstances....

I can't agree about Clinton being better than either of them (GWB and RR), Bush I is probably a toss up, but given Clinton's irrefutable subversion of the judicial system and disrespect for the rule of law I would have to give the edge to Bush I.....



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (443548)8/15/2003 3:39:13 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Since it isn't true, why would we be pissed off?



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (443548)8/15/2003 5:02:57 PM
From: DavesM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
re:"The truth is that neocons can't seem to get over the fact that Clinton was a much better president than Reagan and both Bushes. THAT really pisses them off."

If Clinton was so great, why do Democrats ignore the lessons of his success, and run once again to the left? Why not try to stand firm and hold the center?