Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (173933)	8/16/2003 1:09:19 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574059

That's not true......in a recent article I read, they said that there is not enough money for the Iraqi postwar efforts and terrorist monies have been diverted to that effort. Don't ask me to find the article......I have no idea where I saw it. The amount spent on anti-terrorism has not gone down so that article is inncurate. The monies that were intended for the war on terror have been diverted to Iraq under the guise that the Iraqi war is a part of the war on terrorism when it is not. Under these circumstances, you can pretend that the amount spent on the war on terrorism has not gone down but in reality it has. There is X amount of money......if funds are diverted from one account to another, then the first account comes up short No funds are being diverted from anti-terrorism, the amount spent in that area continues to increase. Yes, and the sky isn't blue. ted