SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Doug R who wrote (443937)8/16/2003 12:14:07 AM
From: Vitas  Respond to of 769670
 
Typical demolib answer.

When you grow up you will learn to respond to facts and not to your imaginations. In the meantime, you are welcome to post link(s) to your answer. -lol-



To: Doug R who wrote (443937)8/16/2003 12:32:44 AM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Doug,

I agree, that there are always alternatives that can be considered. One was picked and acted upon. Now we have a new circumstance. Let's move forward, constructively and with regard for justice in the world...no guarantees but at least let's have a positive regard for a just coexistance with and among our neighbors across the sea. Allowing heinous thugs to continue their rule with brutal despotism (because America is not in immediate danger) is not honorable...at least not when we are in a position to put a stop to it.



To: Doug R who wrote (443937)8/16/2003 10:00:24 PM
From: Vitas  Respond to of 769670
 
>>>unilaterally invade<<<

wrong again, el presidente

15 countries on the U.N. security council agreed, unanimously.

Numerous countries participated in the effort to enforce what was the proper manner to respond to Saddam's flipping YOU the royal raspberry in YOUR face.

NOTHING unilateral about it.

So, el presidente, how would you have responded? -lol-