Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (111781)	8/17/2003 2:56:26 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

But to take territory requires soldiers, and Israel probably didn't have enough back then Carl, I was talking about the land that the Israelis actually did take, which obviously they had soldiers enough to take. I was also talking about Moshe Dayan's behavior in 1967. He could have driven many more Arabs out of the West Bank simply by fomenting a panic. Instead, he went out of his way to calm a panic. Nice of you to suggest that maybe the Israelis of 48 had some virtues, though you don't think the present day Israelis do! The Israelis have always been willing to compromise. It's the Arabs who still to this day recognize only their own claims and hear the word "surrender" whenever someone says "compromise"