SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (72528)8/18/2003 7:36:46 AM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 82486
 
Interesting. When I reached the word, bloated, in the review, though, I pretty much decided I wasn't going to read it. It would be interesting, though, to see the authors interviewed about the book.



To: epicure who wrote (72528)8/18/2003 8:00:32 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Did you read the piece I posted to Jewel on moral absolutism? I scoured the site and what I gleaned from it is that the moral absolutists have two main gripes about moral relativism. One is the issue of whether right and wrong can vary from culture to culture. Most of the discussion that we've had on the subject here has been about that feature.

What interested me was the other feature--the complaint that relativists see right and wrong as a function of whether the outcome is good or not rather than the act. I don't know if I had just checked my brain at the door or what but that was new info to me. If that issue was ever raised, it blew right by me. First of all, it never occurred to me that relativists didn't see some acts as basically good or bad, all else being equal, like lying is bad and telling the truth is good, generally. It never occurred to me that anyone didn't think that. I thought the issue was merely one of whether one should lie to a mother dying from a car crash to tell her her kid survived when, in fact, he didn't, so she could die in peace.

Of course, that site was oversimplified, but that's what I got from it.



To: epicure who wrote (72528)8/18/2003 8:34:13 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Minneapolis Elf Has All the Right Answers

By GREGG AAMOT
Associated Press Writer





MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -- Four-year-old Shira Rabkin wanted to ask just the right questions, so she thought long and hard.

"Dear Mr. Little Guy," she finally scrawled in big letters across a sheet of paper. "Do you like mints?" After some more pondering, she added, "and going to Camp Snoopy? Love, Shira."

Mr. Little Guy was nowhere in sight this early August evening, so Shira stuffed her letter behind his door at the base of a hollowed out ash tree. It's always open, and always full - of letters, pens, flowers and coins.

The elusive elf has enchanted Twin Citians ever since the 6-inch wooden door appeared eight years ago, just off a walking path around popular Lake Harriet. Double takes led to messages, and messages to answers - and somehow Mr. Little Guy keeps up, responding to the queries in typed notes half the size of business cards.

Some of his notes are left in the tree for children to find; others, if he has an address, are mailed. So many children visit that a patch of grass once leading to Mr. Little Guy's door is now powdery dirt. A flower bed bordered by stone surrounds one side of the tree.

Advertisement



Shira is headed to kindergarten, and she's a big believer. But parents are smitten, too.

"I think it's darling," said Susan Scofield, Shira's mother. "I think it's magical."

Said Shira's dad, Jeff Rabkin: "The really amazing thing is that here it is, in a public space all this time, and it hasn't been debated before the City Council! Nobody has chopped the tree down!"

Dave West and his son, Oliver, recently peddled their bikes over to the elf's house. Oliver wanted to know how Mr. Little Guy survives and posed several theories. The 8-year-old figured there must be a bedroom and kitchen behind the brown door. Maybe even a long ladder running along the inside.

"A minnow could feed him for a week," he declared.

In an interview, the local man behind Mr. Little Guy said he gets 1,500 notes a year and answers all of them himself. While that give-and-take fuels his creative side, it's not so easy to do with a wife and young daughter, said "Thom," who spoke on condition of anonymity.

But he always responds, with a childlike directness of his own.

"dear bobby," says one response, typed in Mr. Little Guy's preferred lowercase. "i am taller than my younger brother and shorter than my older brother. i am fifty-one. i like soccer but i love elfball. i played yesterday, with a bunch of elves."

It can be a big chore being Mr. Little Guy. He said he never meant his little house to attract so many youngsters - it was just a secret place for him and his family, at first. His wife originally spotted the tree opening and thought it would make a great place for an elf family.

Another elf house has recently sprung up in the neighborhood, about 30 yards away. It has a wooden frame and roof and a tiny door that sits next to a tree. Mr. Little Guy isn't sure who it belongs to, but he doesn't mind having a new neighbor who is also reaching out to children.

Mr. Little Guy almost lost his house once, when someone marked the tree with a big red X, indicating it should be chopped down. City workers declared it a prank, however, and saved the tree.

That was a rare show of cynicism about the elf.

Most press reports tell of his good deeds and the fun he has around the lake, without revealing much about his life, what he looks like or when he might be seen.

And that's just fine with Mr. Little Guy. Any attention, he said, should be focused on his young friends.

"I don't know that all kids think they have somebody in their corner, so Mr. Little Guy is just a guy that's in their corner," he said. "It's all about being affirmative. Every letter finishes with `i believe in you.'"

Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved.



To: epicure who wrote (72528)8/18/2003 8:55:48 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 82486
 
Here's a little something for the feminist and movie buff:

Documentary is on actresses and aging
Debra Winger's big-screen exit spurs filmmaker
By Edward Guthman
SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE

Debra Winger was one of Hollywood's top stars in the early 1980s, but she figured out pretty quickly that something was wrong in a business that sets impossible standards of youth and beauty.

During the making of "An Officer and a Gentleman," producer Don Simpson knocked on her door and handed her a manila envelope. Inside was a diuretic pill. "We watched the dailies," Simpson said in a low, I'm-doing-you-a-favor voice. "You look a little bloated."

It was that kind of humiliation that eventually drove the gifted actress out of the business. Unlike the rest of her peers - who still fight for parts, go for Botox injections and struggle not to look their age - Winger just walked away at 39.

Her departure, so rare among actresses, inspired a new documentary about female survival in the movie industry. Directed by actress Rosanna Arquette, "Searching for Debra Winger" is a fascinating look at aging and adjustment in a high-stress, youth-worshiping profession.

Arquette interviews 36 well-known actresses, some in groups and some individually, and elicits a frankness and intimacy that she couldn't if she weren't a fellow warrior. Many seem thrilled to have a forum to express their frustration with the movie business; Jane Fonda, who retired 12 years ago, is especially moving.

"The reality is that most people look like me," says Whoopi Goldberg, 47, of Hollywood's youth-and-beauty fixation. "(Hollywood) is a different world. All these women cut their bodies up, cut their faces up. They're sort of reproducing like an amoeba."

With few roles written for mature women, especially in studio features, are actresses feeling pressure to retain their youth at any cost?

Research would seem to bear that out. According to Martha Lauzen, a communications professor at San Diego State University and author of "The Celluloid Ceiling Study," more than half the men in movies are older than 35, while only 8 percent of the women fall in the same category.

Lauzen also found that in 250 films released in 2001, only 25 percent of the characters were women. Directors and writers scored even worse that year: Six percent of the top films were directed by women; 10 percent were written by women.

The Screen Actors Guild came up with different numbers that same year, claiming that women received 38 percent of all movie roles. Either way, it's a dispiriting statistic given that women make up 50.9 percent of the U.S. populace.

Dazzling exceptions exist on the big screen; they always will.

Last year, at 53, Meryl Streep had two of her best roles ever, in "The Hours" and "Adaptation." Frances McDormand, 45, is sexy, funny and strong in "Laurel Canyon." Julianne Moore, 42, is in her prime, and Jessica Lange, 54, Susan Sarandon, 56, and Goldie Hawn, 57, are still very much in the game.

Whether those women can win roles into their 60s and 70s, as men often do, remains to be seen. "There's more dignity in aging in France and England and Europe," says Tracey Ullman, 43, in "Searching for Debra Winger." "You see many more women having better careers in their 50s and 60s. Here it's Gene Hackman, Al Pacino, Sean Connery. Name three women of that age that are still working."

Part of the problem, says Samantha Mathis, 33, is "the 'Revenge of the Nerds' syndrome. All these guys that couldn't get a date in high school. They're smart, but they have no social skills, and suddenly they're running the studios."

They're the ones who decide what preteen and teen-age boys - the No. 1 perceived moviegoing demographic - want to see. Because teenage boys seem to like toilet humor and car chases, aging women are more often going to cable TV and theater to find work.

When an actress goes in for a reading, says "E.R." star Julianna Margulies, 37, she's rated not only on her looks, but also on how much the men in the room would like to have sex with her.

It sounds horrifying, but when Margulies says this in the film, at a luncheon with Mathis, Daryl Hannah, Melanie Griffith, Patricia Arquette and Kelly Lynch, each of the actresses nods in grim assent. They've all been there.

In the film, Winger, a naturally beautiful 46, says it took her five years to drop her career, "to believe that I wasn't addicted, that my life would (still) be good.

"I guess I've turned the word 'passion' into whatever it is that melts your heart, that keeps you soft and open. That's what you should be following. And show business just made me rough and hard."