Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (444776)	8/18/2003 5:48:27 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Funny thing is, your proved her quote. She can't call them what she wants to call them because she will be attacked as some kind of McCarthyite. Prescient.

To: Neocon who wrote (444776)	8/18/2003 6:00:27 PM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

She is a sick.....sick sick person. No wonder you love her. CC

To: Neocon who wrote (444776)	8/18/2003 7:49:32 PM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Ok, let's examine this statement: Liberals relentlessly attack their country How so? Via protest? Via opposition of their political opponents? Most 'liberals' do exactly what most 'conservatives' do; engage in political debate, and sometimes protest, to right what they consider to be wrongs. If liberals are relentlessly attacking their country, then conservatives are doing the same. but we can't call them traitors Oh, but to the tune of millions of dollars, Queen Ann has found that you can indeed call them traitors. And make a pile of money doing so. which they manifestly are And, by applying the same argument, so are conservatives. because that would be 'McCarthyism' This is whether Queen Ann is quite devious. She is not herself practising McCarthism, because she is not naming names. Who are the traitors? Chris Matthews asks. All of them. she replies. McCarthy had very specific alligations against named people. It turned out that he made a bunch of them up to serve his political needs. Queen Ann sees the trap, and avoids it. which never existed Bunk. Her 'research' didn't turn up anyone ruined by McCarthy's lies, because she wasn't looking. It did not fit the premise of her argument. Like so many revisionists, she picked through the facts like an old lady looking for the best fruit at the local grocery. The ones that looked good, she bought. The rest, she left in the bin.