SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (112016)8/19/2003 11:00:38 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The US would still be responsible for much if not most of the support for UN Iraqi mission. The difference would be that a UN mission would be legitimate -- something the US on its own lacks.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (112016)8/20/2003 3:06:10 AM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Hawkmoon; Re: "Personally, I think today's events will force Annan and other UNSC members to get off their @sses and provide Bush the kind of international support that is required to stem the ongoing insurgency."

You will be disappointed. More likely the UN and various other neutral aid providers will pull out as they are increasingly targeted.

-- Carl


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News