SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: miraje who wrote (445232)8/19/2003 5:59:04 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
.

Yet not a word from Bustamante about the bloated state bureaucracy and overpaid, parasitic public employee unions


There must have been a word from Bustamante about the unions. I think it was YES......we know what the question was.

Big union endorses Bustamante, threat of legal delay wanes




        

By James P. Sweeney and Dana Wilkie
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE

8:28 p.m., August 18, 2003

SACRAMENTO – Organized labor's attempt to reserve all of its political firepower for Gov. Gray Davis in the recall campaign began to crumble Monday when three major unions endorsed Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante as an alternative candidate.

The California State Employees Association, followed by the Association of Highway Patrolmen, said they will embrace Bustamante's campaign theme, urging their members and the public to oppose the recall but vote for Bustamante should Davis be removed. The carpenters' union simply endorsed Bustamante.

They are the first to abandon labor's call to coalesce behind the embattled Democratic governor as the best stategy against the recall. Several more powerful unions also are openly pondering spreading their support around.



To: miraje who wrote (445232)8/19/2003 7:26:44 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Respond to of 769670
 
the high tech industry is all for the reassess of commercial property taxes. This is the prop 13 loophole that allows all these deadwood companies that used to be here in the 70s effectively pay no taxes. It keeps uncompetitive businesses here when they should go.

ordinarily business does not support reassessing, or raising taxes so you know if an industry supports it (as the tech industry supports dumping this law)- there is a corrupt or unfair aspect of it.



To: miraje who wrote (445232)8/19/2003 7:33:33 PM
From: Kevin Rose  Respond to of 769670
 
increase the levy on alcoholic beverages by 25 cents a gallon,

You can't smoke in a CA bar now. Looks like you won't be able to afford a drink, soon.


Just how much do you plan on drinking, where an extra $.25/gallon will be a financial burden? ;)