Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (112130)	8/20/2003 1:16:38 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

It's interesting, yet predictable, to read so many out of alignment assumptions the critics of this war need to go through, in order to post their drumbeat of anti-war postings. Here's ten incorrect assumptions I've noticed. 1. We invaded because WMD were going to ran down on us any day. Bush told us so. 2. It was going to be a smooth cake walk, not costing any lives. 3. We anticipated no problems with the infrastructure of Iraq. Everything including the lights were going to work perfectly. 4. We expected to be finished our work in less than 4 months. 5. We expected it to cost very little. 6. Terrorists would be frightened to such a degree they would never strike again in Iraq. 7. No one was going to get killed. Including innocent photographers. 8. It was all over after the first 20 days. 9. Every Iraqi would sing Kumbia at our presence. 10. Terrorism would disappear the world over because of this action.