To: Rarebird who wrote (25851 ) 8/20/2003 1:41:56 PM From: stockman_scott Respond to of 89467 Cover-up on Iraq exposed dailynews.co.za August 20, 2003 When the names of the witnesses called to testify at this week's sessions of the Hutton inquiry were announced, it was hoped that the torch that had so illuminated the dark recesses of the Ministry of Defence and the BBC would shine as brightly on Downing Street. Within hours of the start of the proceedings, those hopes were realised. A clutch of revelations have corroborated almost all the key charges made by Dr David Kelly, as they were originally reported by the BBC. Charge One was that the dossier had been "transformed" in the last week before publication. An email from the Prime Minister's Communications Director, Alastair Campbell, to Blair's chief of staff said the dossier was undergoing a "substantial re-write" overseen, among others, by the chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, John Scarlett. Charge Two was that the dossier had been "sexed up" to make the Prime Minister's case for war. Among the "sexiest" of the details was the claim that Saddam Hussein could have weapons of mass destruction deployed within 45 minutes. Successive versions of the dossier released last week showed that the 45-minute claim was indeed a late addition. Yesterday an email from Blair's chief of staff, Jonathan Powell, to senior colleagues in the Prime Minister's office showed that Powell considered the arguments for war still too weak. Damning the dossier with faint praise, Powell - an experienced ex-diplomat - said in its current form it would convince only "those who are prepared to be convinced". Charge Three was that Campbell himself had authorised the "sexing up" and inserted the 45-minute claim. Yesterday's emails showed that it was none other than Campbell who informed Powell that the dossier was being rewritten, and none other than Campbell to whom Powell sent his withering assessment. This may have been simply because Campbell was acting in his capacity as Communications Director. The late Kelly, according to those reporters who spoke to him, veered between identifying Campbell as personally involved or responsible by virtue of his position. The distinction hardly matters. Kelly's accusations - and the BBC's reporting of them - are vindicated. Directly and indirectly, yesterday's testimony from those at the nerve-centre of power in Britain showed up a consistent discrepancy between appearance and reality - the very discrepancy that has left Blair's credibility so damaged. We saw the cool and quiet manners of those who gave evidence. But little flashes - from emails sent at the time, from phrases snatched from other people's conversations, from the occasional spontaneous remark - belied that untroubled facade. A spokesman was quoted as describing the dispute between Downing Street and the BBC as "a game of chicken". And, as if manipulating information was second nature, Powell ends his assessment of the dossier by offering Saddam Hussein some media advice. "If I was Saddam," he says, "I would take a party of Western journalists to the Ibn Sina factory ... to demonstrate there is nothing there." No doubt Saddam would have thanked him for the advice. Whether it will either help the Government press its case against the BBC or justify its treatment of David Kelly is quite another matter. - The Independent, London