Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (12767)	8/20/2003 8:35:06 PM
From: deeno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

"you think a 20% across the board spending cut 1) is possible due to federal mandates " yes "will cover 38 billion in deficits? No way." dont know. might take, 2YEARS right?! Your answer. tax those other people more. we learned our lesson. ridiculos. thank god for prop 13. now if we could only do that for other tax rates or maybe WORKMANS COMP. "Do you know what REVENUES were for CA last year?" and when times were good? "California is 38% in the nation in property tax revenues." not sure that line makes sense and looked at the link. think you better cut and paste your point, i couldnt find it. You "TAX THOSE OTHER PEOPLE" forget the government is insatible. But if you insist on cutting 50% to do it in one year you got my vote. (assuming you had the $3,500 to file)