Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (174255)	8/21/2003 5:33:00 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1577925

It looks like Kelley was more involved with Blair and his office that one would suspect at first blush. Its very strange. You know, the ironic thing is that, if Blair falls and Labour falters, there are rather hawkish conservatives in the wings more than happy to step in. I am not sure that would be an improvement for the world and the UK. I can't go by party affiliation.......the situation is too fluid. Blair has done things I would never expect a Labour PM to do. Bush has done things I would never expect an American president to do. I can no longer rely on a party ID to determine who I prefer but rather I think we need to call them the way we see them. Besides, in opposition to Blair, the Tories have taken an anti hawkish stance and one thing Labour sans T. Blair and the Tories both agree on is that they think Bush is an idiot. ted