SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Jones who wrote (12883)8/21/2003 7:57:45 PM
From: TommasoRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
>>>After all there's no proof that either one exists <<<

Oh please, get serious.

What proof do you have that they do not exist?

Do you really think that the press would let Buffett get away with lying about something like that. And why should he lie?

Oh please. If you want to say something so foolish, go to the courthouses where each of the properties is listed and look it up. It's a matter of public record.



To: David Jones who wrote (12883)8/22/2003 8:42:44 AM
From: bozwoodRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
"We here have been putting allot of emphasis on what WB said about his two properties. I for one would like the details and to see these two properties. After all there's no proof that either one exists nor the details for which they fall under such tax conditions. "

Right. He has *a lot* to gain by making up houses and property tax figures. Much of what he does is based on his word and I seriously doubt he will risk his reputation in the way you suggest.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News