To: stockman_scott who wrote (26013 ) 8/22/2003 12:02:15 AM From: Karen Lawrence Respond to of 89467 U.S. presses for help in Iraq - after snubbing and deriding the UN, the Bush gang wants their help. As John Cory wrote: Will someone please wake up the real America? From:Reuters Friday, 22nd August, 2003 home.eircom.net By Evelyn Leopold and Michael Georgy UNITED NATIONS/BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The United States is pushing for a new U.N. resolution that would encourage countries to send troops to Iraq, but has encountered resistance from key Security Council members demanding greater control. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, who met with U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan after the devastating attack on U.N. headquarters in Baghdad, said he was exploring a new Security Council resolution that "might encourage others" to support the struggling U.S. and British effort to stabilise the country. "We're looking forward to language that might call on member states to do more," Powell said. In Baghdad, where rescue efforts continued amid fading hopes two days after the truck bomb killed 24 people, the U.S. military reported a success, announcing the capture of Saddam Hussein's feared cousin, "Chemical Ali" Hassan al-Majid, No. 5 on a U.S. list of the 55 most-wanted Iraqi fugitives. The capture of the chemical weapons specialist, the second of a senior Iraqi leader this week, fuelled U.S. hopes its forces might be closing in on Saddam Hussein and are capable of quelling the chaos that has gripped the country. The top U.N. envoy in Iraq, Sergio Vieira de Mello, was killed in the blast and his spokesman, Salim Lone, said, "We hope until the bitter end to find someone, but it does not look good at this stage." Annan told Baghdad staff in a recorded message: "The ache in our souls is almost too much to bear." A previously unknown Islamist group claimed responsibility for the suspected suicide bombing, Dubai-based Al Arabiya reported. The Arabic television channel said the group called itself the "Armed Vanguards of the Second Mohammed Army." U.S. SEEKS HELP The United States seized on the bombing to try again to get international help in Iraq, where ambush attacks and sabotage have continued since the United States declared major combat operations over May 1. Most attacks had been directed against occupying American soldiers before Tuesday's carnage at the U.N. headquarters. Army Gen. John Abizaid, the head of U.S. Central Command, told a Pentagon briefing that attacks of "growing sophistication" had become the main threat for U.S.-led forces. "Clearly, it is emerging as the No. 1 security threat, and we are applying a lot of time, energy and resources to identify it, understand it and deal with it," Abizaid said. British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said during a visit to U.N. headquarters in New York that no one should doubt now that "terrorism is not just against the United States or against the United Kingdom or against Israel." "This is a war against the world, and attacking the United Nations was an attack on the international community, on the world, and it's an attack on the people of Iraq," he said. The United States wants countries to commit more troops to Iraq to provide security for humanitarian work despite its insistence on remaining firmly in control of the occupation and reconstruction of the country. One purpose of a new resolution would be to get Muslim troops into Iraq, from Pakistan and Middle Eastern countries, as well as forces from India and other countries that have refused to send soldiers without U.N. authorisation. Powell said about 30 countries besides the United States have contributed 22,000 troops, and more were expected. But France immediately said Washington would have to broaden the political role of the United Nations if it wanted other nations to pitch in. "To share the burden and the responsibilities in a world of equal and sovereign nations, also means sharing information and authority," French envoy Michel Duclos told a Security Council discussion. "This political transition will have a greater chance of success if it is guided by the Iraqis themselves with the assistance not of the occupation forces but of the international community as a whole," he said. Russia's U.N. Ambassador Sergei Lavrov agreed and German envoy Wolfgang Trautwein called for a "wider U.N. role in the political field" as well as "broader military cooperation." All three countries opposed the U.S.-British invasion of Iraq. Annan said he thought that despite differences among Security Council members, there was a willingness to see that Iraq was stabilized and he urged countries to support the effort to restore peace. "I think the issue of Iraq is of great concern to everybody, regardless of the divisions that existed before the war," Annan said in reference to the refusal by the Security Council to authorize the invasion of Iraq. Annan vowed the United Nations would stay in Iraq and continue its work but operations were expected to resume on Saturday with a reduced staff. Copyright (2003) Reuters.