SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (72984)8/22/2003 8:50:38 AM
From: epicure  Respond to of 82486
 
I don't particularly like defiance of constitutional principles. I like defiance of prejudice- so if there were a rule, for example, that religions had to hide themselves away (a la Neo) and some poor discriminated Christian was protesting by wearing a cross, then I would cheer. But at a time when the great majority claim to be Christian, and their is Christian stuff everywhere. it's going to be the very rare occasion when I'm going to Cheer for the oppressor.



To: Lane3 who wrote (72984)8/22/2003 11:13:24 AM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 82486
 
There is no excuse for a judge defying a lawful ruling from a higher court.

Maybe not in this case.

But don't make that an absolute principle. Sometimes there is.



To: Lane3 who wrote (72984)8/22/2003 12:17:48 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"There is no excuse for a judge defying a lawful ruling from a higher court. That's when you quit and regroup to try another tack. Moore totally lost me when he didn't immediately accede to the ruling.

Yes. I consider this a more important issue. Why is a judge able to do this? Isn't it contempt of court?



To: Lane3 who wrote (72984)8/22/2003 7:59:29 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 82486
 
I guess we think alike on this -

Message 19234037