Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck who wrote (7594)	8/22/2003 1:32:39 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8683

Darren, folks like you and GZ raise Rambo like slogans "....Nuke them..." What do you think should be the specifics. Do you think Bush stopped the US advance prematurely in Aghanistan. Should he not have moved into Pakistan to flush those Osama bastards? Why didn't he? I am sure the Indians would have stationed their troops to halt Osama and his men fleeing into India. DO you think it is too late to do that? Should we move our troops out of Baghdad and redirect them to Pakistan and turn on the heat on Osama, who I think has a direct role in the the recent wave. We know Saddam is a paper tiger, a local bully whose activities extended only to torturing his own people. So why are we throwing money and US lives to getting him? The real enemy lies elsewhere. Should we write to Cheney/Rumsfeld to forget about Iraqi oil, the Haliburton exclusive contract on Iraq and turn their attention on chasing Osama and his men in Pakistan? I mean sit in an armchair and say "...Nuke them..." gets nothing. Instead we slowly keep loosing US lives (1 soldier killed today)