Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (73092)	8/22/2003 4:29:33 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Given my orientation, I would prefer teaching comparative religions I agree with that. That seems to me to be unduly confrontational. I can understand that. It's much like my reaction to the constitutional amendment on marriage. What we don't know is what transpired prior to legal action. We don't know if any attempt was made by either side to come to an understanding or if one side just came out swinging. To much coming-out-swinging going on in the world. If there is an attempt to negotiate some civil resolution of the issue and that attempt is brushed off by those in power, then I don't think it unreasonable to go to the courts if there is likelihood of the courts siding with you, as the court did in this case. I think it is a terrible shame, but I can't find it unreasonable, and I think the authority figures have a good share of the blame.