SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BubbaFred who wrote (26122)8/22/2003 7:57:09 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
DANIEL SCHORR: Four-star general for president?

modbee.com

The Christian Science Monitor

Published: August 21, 2003, 07:50:00 PM PDT

WASHINGTON (CSM) - Wesley Clark, whom I know slightly, shares one quality with Gen. Dwight Eisenhower - one of the most popular presidents of our time - and Colin Powell, who might have been had he chosen to run.

It is the ability to jettison military jargon and address civilians in civilian terms. This quality served Mr. Clark in good stead in 1996 when he faced mandatory retirement under the Army's "up or out" policy. The three-star general was completing his term as director of strategic planning for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the military command had no four-star assignment to offer him.

The smooth-talking general managed to enlist the interests of Defense Secretary William Perry, and even President Clinton. Clark ended up with the Southern Command - and four stars.

The Rhodes scholar who was also first in his class at West Point and was wounded in Vietnam has the necessary pedigree for a candidate in a time of security concerns. But for one who has spent most of his professional life in uniform, he also has an unusual ability to address civilian concerns.

On television, he argued for affirmative action and against a big tax cut. On CNN's "Crossfire" he spoke out against permitting "a long-term deficit." On "Meet The Press" he spoke out against the abridgment of civil liberties in pursuit of the war against terrorism.

Will the former supreme commander of NATO forces run for president? I suspect that this is for him a strategic issue and that he is conducting a feasibility study, or, perhaps, a reconnaissance. Can he, starting late, raise enough money before the primaries to make him look electable? Do people respond to a soldier-intellectual? I imagine Clark will run only if he thinks he has a chance.
___________________

Daniel Schorr is a senior news analyst at National Public Radio.



To: BubbaFred who wrote (26122)8/22/2003 10:01:03 PM
From: RealMuLan  Respond to of 89467
 
>>US has better and smaller than suitcases. They have envelopes of anthrax, and that's a fact. Inside job by the GOP and all were sent to Democrats. <<

LOL. I did not notice that all the recipients in Congress were Democrats<g> And I remember at the peak of it, some anti-abortion right activists also sent anthrax to abortion doctors/clinics. Maybe they were the same bunch?<g>