SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (73126)8/23/2003 7:01:33 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
The 10 Commandments Answer
by Brad Edmonds

We've all heard about the flap over the 10 Commandments monument Chief Justice Roy Moore installed in the rotunda of the Alabama Supreme Court. The ACLU and SPLC and some others want the monument removed to preserve the separation of church and state. Supporters of Roy Moore are Christians, mostly from southeastern states. They want the monument to stay because of what it represents – a rock in the foundation of our American culture and history, and a symbolic return to earlier and more wholesome times. At the very least, the monument is intended to acknowledge God and what Roy Moore believes to be the foundation of American law.

Both sides should switch sides.

As Lew pointed out yesterday, allowing government units to adopt religious postures will strengthen many people's perception that the government is morally legitimate. People are less likely to oppose a government with which they think they agree on fundamental religious and philosophical issues. This is part of why Muslim fundamentalist governments are so hard to overthrow from within even when they are murderously abusive of their subjects. As Murray Rothbard pointed out, governments exist truly at the whim of the governed, even in despotic regimes. In every society, the governed outnumber the rulers by so much that if the governed were to organize, the rulers would be unable to resist them.

Hence, the federal courts should be pleased to have the 10 Commandments displayed in all courtrooms. It would help make the great masses more obedient, thereby enhancing government power and job security for judges. The same line of thinking goes for the SPLC, which though it claims to be in the business of thwarting "hate, intolerance and discrimination," is really about the business of using government courts to thwart property rights and freedom of association. The SPLC, then, also would benefit from having the 10 Commandments in every courthouse in the land. The ACLU, for its part, is sometimes for liberty (particularly when the issue is the liberty of adult men to molest young boys), and sometimes against it (as when a store owner might not wish to hire homosexual activists). But since the ACLU uses the courts to get its way, it, too, would benefit from a population awestruck by the court system.

The Christians, for their part, should want the Commandments removed from the courthouse, and all reference to any religion removed from every aspect of government. First, the government, if it must exist, should be about the accomplishment of purely secular, practical, and limited matters. It should leave the business of religion to the experts. That being said, I do believe that people who have government jobs, including everything from the writing of laws to the cleaning of government restrooms, should consult their consciences unceasingly. It would be my hope that their consciences would be guided by the same light as mine – that's the point of democratic governance – but if not, hey, whatever weakens American trust in government thus increases civilian suspicion and oversight of government. That would be a good thing, entirely consistent with the vision of the founders.

And that's the second point. The Christians opposing removal of the monument want America to return to its founding values and to acknowledge God in public places. The steep moral decline our society has perpetrated the last 40 years is, in my opinion, a direct result of increasing government intervention into our daily lives. The welfare state removed the shame that once accompanied living off the confiscated earnings of others, unwed pregnancy, and even drug addiction. The government war on drugs guaranteed that the drugs arriving on our shores would always be the most powerful and addictive ones, and that violence would accompany their distribution. Earlier than that, Social Security inured us to socialism and removed the shame associated with not planning for one's own future (at the same time that it helped create the very concept of retirement).

Our return to the higher moral standards of old might thus be hastened if we all develop less faith, not more, in government as a moral guide. This would make it easier to begin working to get government out of the moral spheres it has already invaded and worsened. As to acknowledging God in public places: Shop owners, corporations, and property owners already can post the 10 Commandments, other Bible passages, and other uplifting things in view of the public. Surely, at least a few of the Christians protesting removal of the monument are in a position to do just this sort of thing.

Thus, the real long-term goals of the Christians who are opposing the monument's removal might be better met if they let it be removed. Those who are suing for its removal might have their long-term goals better met if they let it stay. Who'da thunk it?

lewrockwell.com



To: Lane3 who wrote (73126)8/23/2003 12:00:28 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
An interesting mixture of church and state:

NEWS: Alabama's Republican Governor Huge Tax Increase.
mensnewsdaily.com.

Conservatives, Christians Battle Alabama Governor on Tax Hike
By Jeff Gannon
Talon News
August 22, 2003
(Talon News) -- Republican Alabama Gov. Bob Riley stirred up controversy last month when he told voters that it is their "Christian duty" to support his $1.2 billion tax increase. Riley's tax package, aimed at erasing budget deficits and reforming an antiquated tax structure, will be decided in a September 9 referendum.

Riley, a Southern Baptist who took office in January said, "According to our Christian ethics, we're supposed to love God, love each other, and help take care of the poor."

The governor has been unable to enlist the support of Alabama's Christian Coalition, which is leading opposition to his plan. They had previously defeated another governor's attempt to fund education with a statewide lottery.

While many religious groups support reform of the state's tax system, few have signed on to Riley's proposal. The Alabama Christian Coalition passed a resolution in May opposing the raising of taxes and blaming the state's budget woes on "years of poor stewardship and fiscal irresponsibility."

In a statement, the group said, "The Christian Coalition is unable to support any new permanent tax proposals to cure historical systemic failures and poor public policy of reckless and unmerited spending habits."

The national Christian Coalition broke with the state organization when its president, Roberta Combs made unannounced visits in four cities across Alabama on August 6 to speak in favor of Riley's plan.

"The Christian Coalition of America supports Gov. Riley's plan for tax reform, because it is clearly and unquestionably designed to help the least among us and asks those who are most able to pay their share," Combs said in a statement.

Alabama Christian Coalition president suggested that politics played a part in the national organization's actions since one of their basic tenets is to oppose tax increases.

Stunned by the national organization's support of Riley's proposal, the state chapter reached out to other national conservative organizations. Over 30 organizations signed a letter sent to Alabama state leaders in opposition of the tax increases. Among them were Americans for Tax Reform, the American Conservative Union, the National Taxpayers Union, and the 60 Plus Association.

Their letter points out that the tax increase of $1.2 billion is for every year, not just a one-time adjustment. It cites a study that predicts a loss of 24,000 jobs and a drop in investment in the state of $403 million.

Even Riley's own party is opposing his plan. Two of the governor's cabinet members resigned after the governor announced his proposal.

Critics of the plan claim that Riley got the support of the teachers' union by inserting language into the referendum that would prohibit public funding of private schools, effectively killing school voucher programs. The Democrat Party chairman is also backing him.

The state is facing a $675 million deficit, and without new revenue, Riley has threatened to release prisoners, cut medicine for the mentally ill, and end Medicaid payments for many nursing home residents. Opponents say there is a "whispering campaign" that promises a push for gambling in Alabama should the referendum fail.

Polls show that the referendum may be headed for defeat. A Philadelphia newspaper on Tuesday quoted Gov. Bob Riley's policy director, David Stewart, as saying Riley's tax plan is behind in the polls because, "The people of Alabama are too ... stupid to know better."