SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (13059)8/23/2003 4:16:30 PM
From: MulhollandDriveRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
>>No one has proven conclusively on this thread or any other that Prop 13 was the primary driver of the above average real estate inflation nor have they proven that without Prop 13 prices in an area like SV would be any more reasonable. Consider that the outrageous real estate price inflation (and subsequent tax increases) were the primary driver behind Prop 13 in the first place. If the law can be faulted at all it is that it failed to do what it was intended to do and that was rein in government spending. <<

the only argument that has been proffered about this that hold any water whatsoever is the "fairness" issue...

and one could poke some holes in that one considering as you pointed out earlier, RE is the only asset class we have that is taxed higher and higher on unrealized gain.

when our state changed over to reassessments of properties (every 2 years) it had absolutely no effect on the prices of the expensive homes in the most desirable zip codes...those properties continued to appreciate handsomely because of their location

and the wealthy (like buffet) can afford the increase, the middle and upper middle class (for that matter even poor if they own property and it is reassessed at higher levels) are the ones who are most effected by rising RE property taxes.

and as you have also aptly pointed out, price inflation was the reason for prop 13 in the first place, if anything, as a result of the RE inflation in some areas other than CA (yes they do exist) we may see a drive for more initiatives in other states like prop 13 as people start realizing just how large those tax increases are, i expect to see more pressure politically for RE tax abatement than the other way around.

money.cnn.com

Taxes: The bane of the housing boom

Property taxes have been rising with home values, in some cases wiping out the effects of low rates.
June 6, 2003: 10:59 AM EDT
By Sarah Max, CNN/Money Staff Writer


New York (CNN/Money) - Willie Fortier, for one, could do without the booming housing market.

For Fortier and homeowners throughout the country, the rise in home values has meant just one thing -- higher property taxes.

"One year my property taxes went up more than 25 percent," said Fortier, a retired postal worker in Wichita, Kan. The annual tax bill on his three-bedroom house, about $1,300, has gone up more than 60 percent since 1999.

For state and local governments, property taxes represent the single largest source of tax revenue. In 2002, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, states and local governments collected almost $285 billion in property taxes, a 9 percent increase from 2001.

For homeowners, however, property taxes represent the single largest expense outside of their mortgage. And while all-time-low mortgage rates allow homeowners to cut their monthly payments, spiraling property taxes eat away at much of that savings.

Calculating your annual dues
According to a survey conducted by the National League of Cities in February, 25 percent of city finance officers said they are responding to budget shortfalls by increasing property taxes.

But with some noteworthy exceptions, such as New York City, most local governments have not made any drastic increases to their property tax rates, at least not yet. They haven't needed to.

Related Articles



For now they are simply counting on home values to keep rising. After all, two things generally affect property taxes: the actual tax rate, or mill levy, and the assessed value by which this rate is multiplied.

"Rates haven't gone up, but as values go up, taxes go up," said Michael Carliner, an economist for the National Association of Home Builders, adding that governments will lower tax rates to counter some, but not all, of the effects of rising home values.

While every state has its own laws regarding how property taxes are levied, local governments have quite a bit of say in what tax rate is applied and how property is assessed. (See "Trim you taxes.")

"We've probably seen about twice the level of public anger and concern this year versus two years ago," said Pete Sepp a spokesperson for the National Taxpayers Union, an advocacy group for lower taxes. "We've also seen a about a 50 percent increase in orders for our brochure on how to fight property taxes."

Pushing up the price of home ownership
If you plan to stay in your house for a while, rising home values can be a curse rather than a blessing.

"For most people, they view rising home values as paper wealth," said Lawrence Yun, senior economist with the National Association of Realtors. And while it's possible to tap this higher value by borrowing against your equity, homeowners still feel they're paying a tax on gains they have not actually realized. "They see rising tax payments as sucking the dollars out of their pockets," Yun added.

Although low mortgage rates are providing the main support for the housing market, Yun and other economists are keeping a close eye on property taxes in forecasting the direction of the housing market. "A higher tax rate dampens enthusiasm for wanting to be a homeowner," said Yun, who is studying the effects of property taxes on home values.

In some cases, any benefit of a lower interest rate can be wiped out by higher property taxes.

For example, say you bought a house for $200,000 for which you borrowed $160,000 at a 6.5 percent rate over 30 years, making your monthly mortgage payment $1,011. Your property tax , meanwhile, is $15 for every $1,000 of your home's assessed value or $3,000 a year.

Now, flash forward a few years. You owe $150,000 on your house and refinance at 5.5 percent, keeping the same terms of your loan. In doing so you reduce your monthly mortgage payment to $890, saving about $1,450 a year.

Ah, but there's just one catch. You live in hot real estate market where prices have increased 15 percent a year, bringing your home's assessed value to $300,000. While you're saving on a lower interest, you are paying $1,500 a year more in property taxes.

But remember, you get what you pay for
The relation between property taxes and home values is complicated.

"If you look at the pattern of house prices, they do reflect property taxes," said Karl Case, a professor of economics at Wellesley College and founding partner of the real estate research firm Fiserv Case Shiller Weiss. All things being equal, buyers will pay less for a house if the property taxes are high.

But, Case explained, it's important to remember that when you buy a house you're also buying the qualities of its neighborhood or town.

On the one hand you may pay more in property taxes to live in an area with good schools, leafy parks and well-maintained streets. On the other (assuming your tax dollars are spent wisely) you reap the benefits of those taxes. And, when it's time to sell, you'll be able to ask more for your property because of its great location.

Hopefully this will give you some comfort when you receive your annual property tax statement.



To: GraceZ who wrote (13059)8/23/2003 6:24:52 PM
From: David JonesRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
......primary driver behind Prop 13 in the first place. If the law can be faulted at all it is that it failed to do what it was intended to do and that was rein in government spending.....

That is true. Then here's again is the 'but'. Prop 13 set a mandatory two thirds vote to increase taxes or pass bonds. But S.V business became a primary mover in the form of funding to exempt any bonds for schools "community colleges included" form such two thirds and lowered the needed vote to fifty five percent. "Prop 39"
Fully some 85% of the moneys used in the campaign for passage of Prop 39 some 30 million came in the form of 100k dollar contributions. It was in no way a grass roots campaign.
Sense the change I don't believe more than a couple school bonds have failed to pass. Those that passed are equal to literally billions of dollars we owe or will owe. The schools seem to be the only others building with the exception of residential as far as I've observed.
Wait I take that back I've seen some hospitals expanding.



To: GraceZ who wrote (13059)8/24/2003 1:03:23 AM
From: JF QuinnellyRespond to of 306849
 
I don't know if this is true nationwide, but one of the inflation drivers in California in the '70s was the decision to allow two incomes to be factored into mortgage loans. Previous to 1975 (or thereabout) only one income was used as the basis for a real estate loan, and housing prices reflected the wages of an individual.

It's hard to believe, but in the late 60s housing prices in southern California were actually lower than in many parts of the country. An aerospace recession helped contribute to that state of affairs.